01 · AI anonymisation
For law firms

Can I give client data to an AI if I anonymise it first?

In short: removing names helps, but it does not make the text safe by itself. It also does not replace any of the legal duties.

02 · Terms

Anonymisation or pseudonymisation?

The two words often come up together. Legally they mean different things.

Anonymised

Nobody can identify the person again. Only then is it no longer personal data.

Pseudonymised

The names are replaced, but a mapping table exists. While it exists, the data stays personal data (Art. 4 no. 5 GDPR, recital 26).

Any tool that puts the names back afterwards only pseudonymises. The mapping table then becomes the secret that has to be protected.
03 · Legal framework

What the law requires

Three rules still apply when names were removed first. Removing them replaces none of these duties.

Section 203 StGB

The provision protects the client's secret. Disclosing it without authorisation is a criminal offence.

Section 43e BRAO

The provision governs when lawyers may engage service providers. The contract with the provider must be in text form.

Art. 28 GDPR

When a provider processes personal data for the firm, the GDPR requires a data processing agreement (AVV). That includes the provider of the language model.

Even with every name removed, the facts of a case can make a person identifiable.
04 · Limits

What an anonymisation tool can and cannot do

Automatic detection helps, but it has fixed limits.

Detection has gaps

Automatic detection misses unusual names, company names, file numbers, licence plates and addresses in free text.

A miss is a leak

What is missed leaves the firm with the text. That nothing was missed cannot be proven.

So a person reviews

Serious tools put a human review before the text leaves the firm. They keep roles such as claimant and defendant, so the text stays readable.

Courts in Bavaria, Hesse and Baden-Württemberg also publish judgments with tools that have a review step. Staff check every output.
05 · Klaracase

How Klaracase avoids the problem

Klaracase starts earlier: data minimisation by design (Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR). The client file does not have to reach Klaracase at all.

The file stays with you

With Klara MCP, the connectors for Claude and comparable AI hosts, Klaracase delivers public case law and norms into your own AI tool.

A map instead of generated text

The research map answers a question with a map of norms, decisions and references. It writes no generated text.

Model stages on EU inference

Klaracase's own model stages run on inference in the EU. Recipients, purposes and retention are listed on the privacy and security page.

Citation Check reads only to verify

Citation Check reads a brief only to verify its citations, and returns one verdict per citation.

06 · Questions

Questions on anonymising before using AI

Research without handing over the file.